I was hoping to make
this post earlier in the week, but arguably I’ve been a little bombarded with
media myself. I find myself trying to
refrain from talking during lecture, really because I can easily get to a point
where I talk too much, so I’ve learned to simply take a step back and allow
things develop and contribute in a more natural manner. This is the beauty of online collaboration; I
can rant as much as I can type. But the
main point I want to drive is related to our reading for this past week and
lecture, while at the same time somewhat of a tangent.
The only time I have had
a more contemporary means of including media in an educational setting, was the
inclusion of the internet and YouTube here at CSUN a few years ago. Before that, my own primary and secondary
education was always rooted in lecture, worksheets, overhead projectors and
plain power points. I always imagine if
I would somehow be smarter, more intelligent, or at least more capable as
access to technology and learning to use this technology efficiently enables
the student to be more resourceful.
I can recall from
adolescent psychology, and several other courses which prepare educators, it is
necessary to use as many means of communicating knowledge and content as
possible because every class will have different students who learn differently. The verbal, the visual, the tactile, the
kinesthetic, all of which are further engaged by different mediums of related
media. It is therefore critical to
include, understand the benefits and limitations of including different
mediums, but the most important decision an educator can make is to include as
many as possible in order to engage every one student in multiple methods of
expression. I can only wonder if this is
an effective method or more of a preferred style.